$24.50 is a fact and the historical high. When looking forward it is a point of reference with respect to trying to figure out what the next high will be....a point you reference constantly...your $2-$3 range.

Why does the stock's historical perspective bother you so much. This is not the first time you have taken exception. Even Agora stated something to the effect that historical pricing in context is fair game for discussion as it relates to stock movement.

I am sensing there is another driving force behind that objection, but I could be wrong.