Free
Message: Minister Gil..it would serve bow right if he is denied his battery cost motion

No question EDIG is entitled to the "costs" they seek. The only think BOW can do is claim the amount re "unreasonable". And as to that, in light of the language used by the judge in his decision, I would say "Good Luck" to the Pear shaped one...

As to Bow's Motion for "Damages" for late delivery, etc. I would say very little chance it will be granted by this judge as he was very clear about to the resons why he was denying all such claims by BOW...

If you recall EDIG had a claim for BOW not paying them the balance of what was due them at the time the 1250 eVUs were delivered. They dropped all their Motions a while back. At the time I wrote that this was a great move by EDIG lawyers to make this jesture.

As it turned out it worked. When writing his decision spanking BOW the Judge made a great poin that the units called by the agreement were indeed delivered and accepted by Bow. Thus nothing else was left for EDIG to do. I am sure he remembered EDIG had dimissed their claim for non performance by BOW in not paying EDIG the remiander of sums due EDIG under the agreement, and he probably considered the ost of Batteries a WASH, and in essense he told BOW get the heck out of my Court...

The Motion by Bow for Batteries will probably be denied in line with the judge's decision, and EDIG shall be given "Costs" after ruling the amount requested to be reasonable...

Gil...

P.S.

Get ready emma. Last chance to load up the Barnhouse...Lol...Lol...

Gil...

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply