"Samsung obtained a license and release on e.Digital’s foreign and domestic patent rights, including the Company’s Flash-R™ patent portfolio, and e.Digital obtained a license and release on certain Samsung patents. e.Digital also received a one-time licensing fee."

Not trying to spin this here, but I've read this statement many times and it makes me wonder if it is different than the other 6 settlements. I need to go back and read them.

My question is, does part 1 mean EDIG did a license deal with reoccuring revs at $X/yr for X years, and part 2 is the infringement 1 time fee?

That word ALSO in part 2 is the head scratcher.

Time that I check the wording of a few of the other 6.

Any opinions out there?