Re: Pacer Digecor
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 02, 2009 06:19PM
That was but one ounce of claim involving batteries....it's not even measurable as to the scope of the whole case.
I would say the implied was aimed at people who have not paid close attention to the case.....and we'll not hold that against them.
Nothing to it other than it being a nuisance. They'll get there 80K in a balanced decision by the court of e.Digitals costs.
doni