Free
Message: Re: Colorado? Because
1
Nov 03, 2009 01:10PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 01:25PM

Nov 03, 2009 01:30PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 01:32PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 01:33PM

Nov 03, 2009 02:02PM
1
Nov 03, 2009 02:47PM

Nov 03, 2009 02:51PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 02:54PM

Nov 03, 2009 03:07PM
1
Nov 03, 2009 03:10PM
1
Nov 03, 2009 04:57PM
16
Nov 03, 2009 05:42PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 05:49PM

Nov 03, 2009 05:53PM
5
Nov 03, 2009 05:59PM
4
Nov 03, 2009 06:04PM
1
Nov 03, 2009 06:06PM
1
Nov 03, 2009 08:12PM

Nov 03, 2009 08:54PM

No thanks, I was kidding.

I think it's important to remember that 6 of the Texas Seven settled within a year. Factor in FF's quote in today's PR about streamlining and accelerating their IP efforts and it's not a big leap to realize DM expects quicker and larger settlements in the licensing process. Remember, only Samsung put up any fight at all...the other 6 simply filed court documents on schedule and probably spent most of their time researching our patents and negotiating a settlement rather than defending their alleged infringment.

IMO most of these new 19 defendants will settle within a year and therefore, there won't be many actual hearings to attend. If there is an important one down the road, I'll be there.

If we see even a modest $5M average settlement and multiply that by 19, we get $95M in 12-18 months. 60% of that is EDIG's cut which comes to $57M. Not too shabby.

I'm still buzzing about the Colorado 19! Huge congrats to EDIG management for keeping this company moving forward.

9
Nov 04, 2009 08:47AM
4
Nov 04, 2009 09:41AM
3
Nov 04, 2009 02:08PM

Nov 04, 2009 02:14PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply