Funny how a shareholder with a substantial position would characterize the company's IP litigators effort at more than tripling the output of infringers, as fluff.

Your comments are almost an indictment of DM not representing their client in their best interests. Do you mean to imply EDIG has a malpractice case?

Your anti-management crusade continues. Now that's fluff I can do without.

We'll talk again when the 19 are booked and 25 more sit on the chopping block, and then you can tell us how poorly they performed.

They told us well in advance that this was the low hanging fruit round and that's exactly what it was. Now they are telling us they are tripling their efforts at more low hanging fruit. To me that translates to over $30 million over the course of the next 12-18 months....then bring on the licensing gig and the tier 2 infringers.