"It stands to question how much our technology is needed? Too bad Doni isn't hear to rebut."

e.Digital is balancing two entirely different fronts....One that has nothing to do with the general public, at all, IMO requiring investment from the industry, and another where they enterprise publicly in a recurring manner.

Today's news is fine with me....I'm all for e.Digital running out a closed system before advancing to the next level. That security patent should show up shortly. They have the ability to advance, should they do that before playing out the venue they are currently in? As I see it, advancing will destroy the current model of recurring revenue.

Re-read the detail on the storage systems....and see if it reads rotating....or something else. When I read it, it seems like something else.

"with 160 GB to 200 GB of rugged and reliable storage for many hours of "

I'd give this some time, now that the shackles have been removed.

Recognition, tech ownership and repetitious business seems a good model to me, along with driving your R&D.

There is a lot more going on than you think...seems the best of all worlds to me.

doni