Re: PACER / Coby correction -- doni
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 09, 2010 09:30PM
thanks Silver....I got the correlation figured out...see the two companies below...
There's a bit of a shuffle on these two....doc 11 belonging to Leica with extension filed by Featherston....and doc 12 belongs to Imation with extension filed by e.Digital ...where doc 13 grants 11 and 12....read 13, thats where the confusion is ....I guess 38 corrects the problem.
Anyway, I would say Imation belongs to Featherstone because of this cross referencing 11 and 12.
I've updated Imation to red status....extension filed by e.Digital
15. Leica Camera, Inc... link connection to Panasonic Corporation of North America?
Defendant representatives: Featherstone, Bruce; Collins, Matthew; Casino, Joseph
12/23/2009 |
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Leica Camera, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Featherstone, Bruce) (Entered: 12/23/2009) |
12/28/2009 | 13 | ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Leica Camera, Inc. answer due 2/15/2010.; granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Leica Camera, Inc. answer due 2/15/2010. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/28/09.TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (msklc2, ) (Entered: 12/28/2009) |
12/28/2009 | 14 | Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Appear by Telephone and Status Report of Counsel for Leica Camera by Defendant Leica Camera, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Featherstone, Bruce) (Entered: 12/28/2009) |
12/29/2009 |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by e.Digital Corporation. Leica Camera, Inc. served on 12/9/2009, answer due 2/15/2010. (Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 12/29/2009) |
12/29/2009 |
38 |
ORDER AMENDING ORDER at 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. The Order grants an extension of time to answer as to both Defendant Leica Camera, Inc. and Imation Corporation to February 15, 2010. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/29/09. TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED(msksec, ) (Entered: 12/29/2009) see...10. Imation doc 12,38,39 |
01/04/2010 |
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Leica Camera, Inc... (Featherstone, Bruce) (Entered: 01/04/2010) |
01/06/2010 |
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph M. Casino on behalf of Leica Camera, Inc.,Panasonic Corporation of North America (Casino, Joseph) (Entered: 01/06/2010) |
01/07/2010 | NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew D. Collins on behalf of Leica Camera, Inc., Panasonic Corporation of North America (Collins, Matthew) (Entered: 01/07/2010) |
10. Imation Corporation link
Defendant representatives: Dariush G. Adli; Featherstone, Bruce; Bell, Stephen see doc 103
12/28/2009 |
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint, For Defendant Imation Corporation by Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Hanlon-Leh, Natalie) (Entered: 12/28/2009) |
2/29/2009 |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by e.Digital Corporation. Imation Corporation served on 12/8/2009, answer due 12/29/2009. (Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 12/29/2009) |
12/29/2009 |
38 |
ORDER AMENDING ORDER at 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. The Order grants an extension of time to answer as to both Defendant Leica Camera, Inc. and Imation Corporationto February 15, 2010. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/29/09. TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED(msksec, ) (Entered: 12/29/2009).... see...Leica Camera, Inc, doc 11, 12, 13,38,39 |
12/29/2009 |
39 |
Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings: Pursuant to the Court's Orders at #13 and #38, Imation Corporation answer due 2/15/2010. TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (msksec, ) (Entered: 12/29/2009) |
doni