Re: Another Glitch? Coyote/ DISCHINO...Gil FLE
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 26, 2010 03:48PM
Although the language by the supreme Court is "Case Specific", (meaning more related to the facts of that case", a broader interpretation of the language could mean that if indeed Apple spliced EDIG tech to their own in created the Apple Patents, they would be immunized from any claims made by EDIG for infringment of their patents...
This, will for sure go up to the Supreme Court for clarification
Gil
If this is the case please do not tell me it will take another 10 years to go thru this, LOL.
If this is the case apple will be IMVHO the last infringer on our hit list. the cash from the previous 169 infringers would have been collected (and banked ) , dividends or stock buy back would have occured, and apple will be our final fight before we can claim our victory on all CE manufactures.