What exactly is your understanding of the phrase?...

Tell me that so as I can comment on it...Lol...Lol...

The long and the short of it that defendants got together and made a proposal...

DM was served with a copy and immediately responded by an e-mail and letter telling defendants it was too early to even talk about Markman Hearing, let alone agree with defendants "ridiculous proposal", (my word not DM'S), that the Court schedule a Markman Hearing prior to any discovery!?...

Defendants are wrong in saying DM omitted any reference to Markman Hearing, yada, yada. DM told them, in a nice way, he is starting his discovery tommorow, no matter denense does not like it. He has a constitutional right to his discovery, and it cannot be put on ice because it will be costly to defendants...

Gil...