PACER
posted on
Feb 23, 2010 08:55PM
Nice retort by DM to the Defendants motion for a Status Conference in Doc 193. DM sure made some great arguments regarding the necessity for discovery prior to the Markman Hearing.
Date Filed |
# |
Docket Text |
|
||
02/23/2010 |
RESPONSE to 189 MOTION for Hearing/Conference Status Conference and Schedule for Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) Conference MOTION for Hearing/Conference Status Conference and Schedule for Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) Conference filed by Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation, Counter Defendants e.Digital Corporation, e.Digital Corporation, e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2010) |
|
02/23/2010 |
AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Ikegami Electronics (USA), Inc., Imation Corporation, Kyocera Communications, Inc., Kyocera International, Inc., Kyocera Corporation, Leica Camera, Inc., Marantz America, Inc., D&M Holdings U.S. Inc., D&M Holdings, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation, Sakar International, Inc., Samson Technologies Corp., Teac America, Inc., VTech Electronics North America, LLC, Pentax of America, Inc., Hoya Corporation, Hoya Corporation USA, DXG Technology Corporation, Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Summit Technology Group, LLC, Canon USA, Inc., Canon Inc., Coby Electronics Corp., DXG Technology (U.S.A.), Inc., filed by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2010) |