The Ikegami PR is definitely worded differently from the Wolverine PR. The "royalty bearing license" simply indicates both companies purchased a license of our IP. The Wolverine PR specifies an undisclosed lump sum payment for past infringing sales where the Ikegami PR doesn't have this language. Does that definitely mean Ikegami didn't pay a lump sum for past infringing sales? Will they add a premium to the royalty payments instead? Or will there be no financial penalty imposed for past sales by Ikegami? I doubt we'll ever know since it's all confidential. The "settlement agreement" merely indicates they have settled their legal differences in this case.

Remember RP said each agreement is unique. I am extremely confident EDIG/DM are expertly handling negotiations and are getting the best deal possible. The fact that we are seeing royalty bearing licenses proves EDIG is trying to garner market interest which if continued, will be a huge positive for shareholders in the future.

I'm out...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.