Free
Message: Re: Gil, Markman, doni
3
Apr 15, 2010 10:32AM
1
Apr 15, 2010 10:47AM
1
Apr 15, 2010 11:02AM
8
Apr 15, 2010 11:28AM
7
Apr 15, 2010 11:39AM

Apr 15, 2010 11:48AM
3
Apr 15, 2010 11:49AM
2
Apr 15, 2010 12:37PM
3
Apr 15, 2010 12:39PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 12:48PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 12:52PM
7
Apr 15, 2010 01:02PM
5
Apr 15, 2010 01:12PM
7
Apr 15, 2010 02:13PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 02:29PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 02:29PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 02:33PM
2
Apr 15, 2010 02:36PM

"The defense was attempting to get a Markman hearing prior to discovery etc, which is bass ackwards."

"Is that not your interpretation too?"

They both have their concerns, e.Digitals contention definitely bears on phase 1 of their approach, they can weed out pertinent and non pertinent information.....which, IMO, would benefit both sides.

They are very straightforward in explanations

doni & doni, LLP

3
Apr 15, 2010 03:05PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply