1) raise the bar

2) streamline, accelerate

3) maximize our IP licensing activities

I am still very much focused on this 5 month old guidance. Certainly for management to make such statements they are being advised by DM as to that shift in strategy from round 1 to round 2.

I too am leaning towards the mind set of several group settlements. While a Markman hearing win will likely come at some point, I don't see that event, in and of itself, as a driver for significant new investment interest even if it would be a key achievement.

Most investors don't understand the nuances of a Markman, but they do understand record revenues, record profits and projections for more to come.

EDIG needs to bank some more dough, announce an even larger 3rd round of infringers pronto in order to keep the revenue growth on target, bolster investor confidence and then go Tier 2 and/or Markman.

All the court success didn't seem to sustain ptsc's revenue growth. I am sure EDIG and DM, who is compensated in the same mode as is EDIG, are brutally aware of the need to paint the bottom line with some significant numbers. That 60-40 split is clean and simple and has both parties on the same page.

This should be a "significant" year in company history.

“With many more prospective licensees of our fundamental IP beyond this second round, we are leveraging the knowledge and experience gained in our initial enforcement actions to raise the bar on our licensing terms and to streamline, accelerate and maximize our IP licensing activities.”