We could have done without the blu prop-up - we all know interpretations of the embedded workigs are subjective and subject to plantifs ability for clear and simple objective exemplification - sure reexam are possible also, but why dwell on it when it hasn't happened yet,,, especially over-n-over.

Have you read some of the recommendations in support of Ron Maltel's ability to exemplify tech subjects? I'm sure even if he doesn't get to testify in a jury trial he's helping PN lay-out a winning strategy.

now i will go read 297

aimo

e