Re: B-Lunist/Summary Judgement...DABOSS.....
posted on
Aug 03, 2010 11:24PM
No! Most companies don't invest in other companies by buying stock unless they are planning a take over.
You are correct. Why would a company RISK money and INVEST in another company. NORMALLY they would not. Many never would.
Do you play backgammon? At the conclusion of a tournament that had a first place prize of $10,000 and $5,000 second place. It was down to the last roll of the dice. The only roll that would cause one player to lose was 6-6, because any roll would get his last two men off on his next roll.
Well this man was a pro and like the smater companies that we are dealing with, he recognized a way to insure that he would not lose. He said loudly that he would bet his opponemt WOULD ROLL 6-6 and WIN. He got two people to take his $100 bet at 29 to 1. Since the chance was 35-1 the two thought they would win an 'easy' $100.
It's simple math and logic. It is seeing opportunity and acting.
Only two things could happen, he'd roll a 6-6 or he wouldn't.
6-6 means the man wins his $100 bets at 29-1 but loses the first place prize.
Anything else he wins $10,000 but loses $200 He pockets $9,800
6-6 he get 2nd at $5000 but wins his side bets, He pockets $10,800
When opputunity presents itself like that those who know how to make good decisions will profit NO MATTER whether they WIN or LOSE.
When we WIN a large setllement what are the chances of our price spiking higher? Isn't that why we are here?
Now, I'll ask you again 'Wouldn't it be smart for an infriger to by buy shares before they settle, so the quick turn profit they make pays their settlement fee? They are not risking their money nor are they truly investing in EDIG. They just see an opportunity that rarely comes along, and they are smart enough to act Not all infringers may be that smart. Would you be?