Re: Discovery
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 09, 2010 06:24PM
Agreed. There have been many motions in this case and often times a court order either granting or denying it on the same day. We must not be understanding what Gil is saying here.
Help us out Gil. Why would this motion (Doc 309) require a hearing and why haven't we seen a reply from DM?
Nothing new on PACER.