AND DISCHINO...

Our case is not at all like the one Judge DAVIS of TEXAS was ruling on...

If you read sman's posts you must have seen the essential argument by defense was that plainitiff in that case was entering a crowded field and their own patent application admitted that there was "PRIOR ART"...

In EDIG case there is NO PRIOR ART period...

Assume DM is doing a great job, let him do his job which has been excellent sofar, and sit back and relax till events take their course...

GLTA...

Gil...