Free
Message: SOURCE: e.Digital Corporation
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

This was response by Robert to Markez in other board ,

As we stated at last year’s meeting of stockholders, because there are over 170 companies that we believe infringe on our Flash-R™ patent portfolio, the objectives of the first round of cases were to put the Company on firm financial footing for the first time in its history and discover the strengths and weaknesses of our Flash-R™ patent portfolio in preparation for subsequent rounds of enforcement activity. We accomplished both of these objectives. Also, as we stated at last year’s meeting, successfully concluding the first round of cases was the price to get the second round of cases on file. As our agreement with Duane Morris is contingency-based, they determine the ‘who, when and where’ of our case filings. As we stated in our November 3, 2009 press release, our strategy is to leverage the knowledge and experience gained from the first round of cases to streamline, accelerate and maximize our Flash-R licensing efforts. To that end, we are looking forward to the January 28th Markman hearing in connection with this round of cases.

As to the elements referred to in the February 11, 2010 press release, there is no way to hint at them without disclosing them. As they are finalized, we will announce them and expect they will be catalysts to significant new investment interest.

Most of your other questions will be addressed in upcoming Company communications. Thank you for your understanding and continued support.

Best regards,

Robert Putnam,
Sr. Vice President
14 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply