Re: Pacer Deadline ! Markman Hearing for January 28, 2011 ....
in response to
by
Message: Re: Pacer Deadline ! Markman Hearing for January 28, 2011 ....
Markman Hearing for January 28, 2011, and upon
oral motion from Plaintiff’s counsel, lifted the stay with regard to further discovery. She postponed the effect of her Order for 21 days to provide the parties with an opportunity to formulate a stipulation to immediately appeal the Court’s claim construction ruling. ( Courtroom Minutes, Dkt. No. 306). However, the parties were not able to reach agreement on such stipulation within the 21-day period and the stay of discovery was lifted as of August 20, 2010. Defendants sought to reinstate the stay of discovery until at least the issues, there is a need for a new scheduling order for discovery on the merits. g. Statement as to whether the parties anticipate that their claims or defenses will involve extensive electronically stored information, or that a substantial amount of disclosure or discovery will involve information or records maintained in electronic form.
on January 28, 2011 by filing Defendants’ Combined Motion For Protective Order To Reinstate
The Stay Of Discovery And Supporting Memorandum (Dkt. No. 309) on August 24, 2010.
Under D.C.COLO.L.CivR 30.2(A), the filing of Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) stayed the discovery during the pendency of the Motion before
the Court. On September 17, 2010, Magistrate Judge Watanabe entered a Minute Order denying
Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 312).
Because the April 15, 2010 Scheduling Order covers only the period of time through the
Court’s
Markman Hearing and does not address discovery related to non-claim construction
5 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply