Re: See my off-topic msg on Auburn vs, Oregon AND

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

silversurfer

Rank: President [?]

Points: 29631 [?]

Votes: 155 Score: 3.5 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: See my off-topic msg on Auburn vs, Oregon AND

in response to

See my off-topic msg on Auburn vs, Oregon AND

OregonGal

posted on Jan 10, 2011 02:18PM

Defendants have until close of business today to respond to DM's motion to not allow Dr. Mihran to testify. Since he was originally identified by the defendants as being a rebuttal witness solely to rebut Mr. Maltiel's expert testimony, and Mr. Maltiel isn't testifying afterall, DM has asked the court to not allow Dr. Mihran to testify.

01/05/2011

351

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's 350 Motion for Hearing/Conference is GRANTED, insofar as the Defendants shall file a response to the Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude 349 on or before January 10, 2011. ENTERED BY Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/5/11.TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (msklc2, ) (Entered: 01/05/2011)

5 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply