PAGE 5: Collins brought up claim 10 of our 774 patent and asked if compression of the received signals would require RAM? Norris said yes. Collins asked where RAM appears in this claim and Norris said something like, “This claim is exclusively RAM” meaning in 1994 you couldn’t get the signal compressed without RAM.

Is Woody's "This claim is exclusively RAM" fairly central to the whole argument?

Seems RAM wasn't referred to in the patent so why should we assume that the patent/claim will be interpreted as being "exclusively RAM"?

What happens if the judge decides the patent does not specifically/generically/exclusively apply to RAM?