Re: GIL..what's your take on that wonderful cross exam of Mihran by Youngwirth????
posted on
Jan 29, 2011 07:02PM
You are being way too modest...
The Cross-X was beyond EXCELLENT...Look how Youngwirth pins Mihran down:...
Q1. Does the Microphone, [box #20 in the 774 patent diagram], provide some form of processing to the sound input?...
A. Yes...
Q2. Does analog/digital, (A/D) conversion is a form of processing?
A. Yes, after a lot of heming and hawing...
Q3. Is there processing occuring after the microphone in the 774 patent diagram?...
A. Yes...
So far our side has demonstrated to the Court, through defense experts testimony, that 774 is involved in analog/digitial processing.
Moving over to DSP issues, Youngwirth starts with:
Q4a. There was a discusiion earlier of a DSP, right?
A. We have never had a discussion. Do you mean you and I?
Q4b. I stated there was a discussion earlier about DSP. Not that you and I had such a discussion. It earleir during Mr. Noris' testimony. Do you remember that?
A. Yes...
So far one can say even though professor adjunct Mihran got his Ph.D., he mainly studied mathematics and Phyisics, and his command of English may be limitted. I can understand that. I had many professors, Noble Prize Winners at that, at Berkeley who spoke perfect German, but had some difficulty with their English. So, one can say Mr. Mihran misunderstood the question by Mr. Youngwirth...
Then Mr. Youngwirth asked all important question that made our case:
Q. Looking at the 774 patent, isn't it true that a DSP would do compression of the received signals?
A. Yes...
Q. Could a digital signal processor do all the things identified in the patent as being done by a Digital Support Processor.
A. Yes...
CHEKMATE...
From this pont onward it only got worse for defendants...
GLTA...
Gil...