Re:doni/ I think the question of the day should be--JAY
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 24, 2011 10:04AM
From SS's report page 3:
Norris talked about CODECs and DSPs and how they work in the 774 patent. He stressed several times that his 774 patent would not work without RAM and that it is obvious to any person skilled in the ordinary art that RAM would be a requirement for the patent to work. He stressed that flash memory is not the same as RAM and that RAM is needed for the received signal to be processed. He said that in his 774 patent, flash memory cannot process the received signal (sound); it only stores the processed data. The processing circuits have to have RAM.
Jameson asked the court to have Exhibit 3 admitted as evidence. No objection by defense. This is the prosecution history of the 774 patent (USPTO docs).