Thanks richardo, but that's not substantiating murgirl's post. She wrote that there was a PR or shareholder's letter which stated DM thought the '774 patent was the most promising. The PR you cited was dated May 2006 and doesn't mention DM, just mentions "independent evaluations". The PR identifying DM as our patent firm wasn't until Mar 2007.

e.Digital Corporation Retains Duane Morris LLP for License Enforcement of Flash Memory Patent Portfolio

SAN DIEGO, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 03/28/07 -- e.Digital Corporation (OTCBB: EDIG), the owner of a portfolio of flash memory-related patents essential to consumer multimedia products, announced today that it has retained Duane Morris LLP (Duane Morris) as its intellectual property (IP) counsel for license enforcement of its flash memory-related patent portfolio.

I would also like to read the PR or shareholder's letter which stated e.Digital thought a patent other than the '774 patent was the "nuts", as murgirl posted.

Of course, there are also the unsubstantiated slams on EDIG management at supposedly not knowing the value of their patents. But we've come to expect those from her.