Re: May of 2006 "774" Bankerson/Bankerson....
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 07, 2011 01:43PM
That is the most clear and understandable analogy I have read on this board to make everyone understand , ( I hope), that our focus should be on what lies ahead, and rehashing of the past is counterproductive at best...
We have been on this voyage together for over a decade. We know the past, and we know edig is hovering at $.08-.10 CENTS...
The pps shall not be affected one way or another by our discovering which patent is more important than the other. The case is in the hands of the Lawyers and they have done their part...
NOW, WE WAIT UNTIL JUDGE KRIEGER HAS SPOKEN. THAT IS WHEN WE SEE MOVEMENT IN THE PPS, ONE WAY OR THE OTHER...
In the meantime PLAY NICE, or go read a book...
GLTA...
Gil...