Abuse? That was abuse?

I guess expressing one's skepticism regarding a new poster who appears out of nowhere only to shed what appears to be some doubt on the Nunchi project, without first producing a shred of evidence to back it up, is not allowed without being called abuse.

Considering the history of the basher's cult that exists to see EDIG's demise along with its investors, asking for proof is out of line ? Have we not witnessed this sort of tactic time and time again?

Coolfool gets the benefit of the doubt as of now, and builds credibility when I see the email to which he refers.

Until then a healthy dose of skepticism is recommended.