Free
Message: Re: And the beauty of the Flashback device ...................
16
May 19, 2011 10:04PM
1
May 19, 2011 10:08PM
8
May 19, 2011 10:13PM
13
May 19, 2011 10:36PM
12
May 19, 2011 11:19PM
14
May 19, 2011 11:28PM
5
May 20, 2011 12:18AM
19
May 20, 2011 02:14AM

"They want to read any type of memory in
connection with processing a signal right out of this patent."

They want to write it out ....but, then they want to write it back in.

Defendants proposed construction:

edig:...“a removable, interchangeable flash memory storage device"

defendants:...“a removable, interchangeable flash memory recording medium”...."without another memory system such as RAM

judge to consider...sort the difference between storage and recording....storage would indicate any type data, or a more broad meaning....recording indicates a specific data having a narrow consideration .... A determination of recording needs to be characterized, ... and is it being considered to muzzle the inventors intent? Is it a storage element or a specific element?....See claim A determination for " main"(sole) memory.

For this proposal, they want the flash identified as being a recording medium....or a self contained entity having a specific use without the need of any other RAM resource.

If they propose that...where is the sound processed that they propose for the following consideration?

defendants:...."sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals: the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals," (precludes the use of other memory)

??

doni

8
May 20, 2011 12:00PM
6
May 20, 2011 12:13PM
9
May 20, 2011 12:22PM
3
May 20, 2011 12:30PM
9
May 20, 2011 12:45PM
10
May 20, 2011 12:50PM
2
May 20, 2011 01:01PM
4
May 20, 2011 01:24PM
3
May 20, 2011 01:43PM
1
May 20, 2011 04:41PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply