Re: And the beauty of the Flashback device ...................
in response to
by
posted on
May 20, 2011 08:22AM
"They want to read any type of memory in
connection with processing a signal right out of this patent."
They want to write it out ....but, then they want to write it back in.
Defendants proposed construction:
edig:...“a removable, interchangeable flash memory storage device"
defendants:...“a removable, interchangeable flash memory recording medium”...."without another memory system such as RAM” judge to consider...sort the difference between storage and recording....storage would indicate any type data, or a more broad meaning....recording indicates a specific data having a narrow consideration .... A determination of recording needs to be characterized, ... and is it being considered to muzzle the inventors intent? Is it a storage element or a specific element?....See claim A determination for " main"(sole) memory.
For this proposal, they want the flash identified as being a recording medium....or a self contained entity having a specific use without the need of any other RAM resource.
If they propose that...where is the sound processed that they propose for the following consideration?
defendants:...."sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals: the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals," (precludes the use of other memory)
??
doni