I get your point as to....without another memory system such as RAM

However,

"I agree that the patent claim would have been better without the word "received". I never did like it and it seems unnecessary.'

e.Digital needs the "received" to designate the use of other prior processing issues.

My concern was of the defendants modification to e.Digitals original phrase.

For that,

Me thinks they(defendants) needed to remove the word received at both references....in order for there to be an assocation with their ending consideration.