As noted previously, the parties essentially agreed that a construction of the disputed
language in the Defendants’ favor would likely be case-dispositive. Although the Court’s
construction is not precisely aligned with that urged by the Defendants, the Court recognizes that
it is nevertheless likely to have that effect. In order to give the parties sufficient time to assess
the import of this decision, the Court will grant the parties 30 days to consider how they wish to
proceed in light of the ruling. All pending deadlines in this action shall be continued for a period
of 30 days. At or before the conclusion of the 30-day period, the parties shall file a joint
statement addressing what issues, if any, remain to be addressed.

Is she saying, "Hey EDIG and DM, after 6 months I think I would rule for the Defendants if I made a ruling. So, wink..wink... DM get what you can from the defendants and Defendants don't pay as much as they are asking."

Furthermore, how can "the Court will grant the parties 30 days to consider how they wish to proceed in light of the ruling. WHAT RULING!!!!!

What the FALK?!