"It seems to me that she can't grasp the technical subject matter, and therefore is not capable of making a ruling."

The court knows the difference between digital and analog....without a doubt.

They picked sides....and in picking sides in the manner it did...it's identifying the total patent as ANALOG and over looking the patent as it's written.

There was no trade off.....the patent is published PURE digital in every and all terminology....period.....for that, there should be a balanced trade off by the court at this preliminary stage...because what it's doing with this opinion is flat out...invalidating the patent and calling it an analog patent.....and that is not the case.

This patent was challenged by digital prior art to be digital....not analog.

doni