Re: If what she gave was an opinion--
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 08, 2011 10:43AM
Here is her version of the patent. It is totally out touch with reality.
Accordingly, the Court concludes that the proper construction of the phrase “a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals” is best addressed in two parts. The phrase “received processed sound electrical signals” refers to the electrical signals that have been generated by the microphone and passed through the amplifier and gain control circuits, but have yet to be converted by the CODEC. The remainder of the disputed language requires that the device use only flash memory, not RAM or any other memory system, while engaging the CODEC, DSP (as applicable), and memory control functions, as well as storing the fully-manipulated data.
(Actually, it appears that she is okay with the device having memory other than flash, as long as it is not used.)