Re: PACER -- Reply To Claim Construction Order
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 28, 2011 05:10PM
And here is the reasoning for yet another ORDER to be issued by the Judge withing 30 days...
"Accordingly, e.Digital proposes that the next step in this case is for the Court to enter an order construing the term “flash memory” of claim 5 of the ‘737 Patent. Defendants acknowledge the Court’s statement at footnote 1 of the Order and believe, as stated later in the Order at page 16, that the Court intended to construe “flash memory” in claim 5 of the ‘737 Patent with the same effect and outcome urged by Defendants. Nevertheless, if further construction of the Order is likely to facilitate e.Digital’s stipulation of non-infringement of this Patent, thereby avoiding the need for summary judgment proceedings and simplifying and further expediting these proceedings for disposition, the Undersigned Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s request for further construction of the term “flash memory” as used in the ‘737 Patent. The parties believe the current record is sufficient for any further construction of the term “flash memory” and do not request another hearing for this purpose."
Assuming the judge issues the requested ORDER, we are past Summary Judgement proceedings, and the case moves on...
Gil...