When Dish and I discuss the concept of burn rate and we are talking less than 1/12 years unless we indentify new revenue sources, and we use the phrase "running out of money" to express that concept, your post defends the financial position of the company as "about the same it has been' as though we were talking nonsense and you say that our big problem is the judge.

Then, when you respond to SS's post you agree with SS and say that we need cash flow to make sure we get to the finish line with the flash portfolio. Which is it? I'm not sure which outlook is the most realistic, but I am darn sure which one I think is!

This is my only post on this subject.