Free
Message: Re: Very important document wording( 747& 737 connection) - MK have to rule on 737

Aug 18, 2011 02:09PM
6
Aug 18, 2011 05:17PM
6
Aug 18, 2011 06:13PM
2
Aug 18, 2011 07:29PM
2
Aug 18, 2011 07:57PM
2
Aug 18, 2011 08:06PM
1
Aug 18, 2011 10:56PM
3
Aug 18, 2011 11:02PM
8
Aug 18, 2011 11:37PM
7
Aug 18, 2011 11:48PM
7
Aug 19, 2011 01:27AM
4
Aug 19, 2011 09:05AM
7
Aug 19, 2011 10:04AM
1
Aug 19, 2011 10:11AM
4
Aug 19, 2011 10:17AM
2
Aug 19, 2011 12:15PM

sman...

claim term B.

1. Origional published phrase: “a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals(Analog) and is capable of retaining recorded digital information for storage in nonvolatile form” (Digital/Analog) (Claims 1 and 19 of the ‘774 Patent)

Pay attention to claims 1(digital) and 19(analog) ......as the phrase relates to both issues.

Courts construction “a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals(Analog)

With that, the court is not recognizing the balance of the phrase, where it's very important to that which it does recognize. Pay attention to the word "information" for its meaning alone......as in directive....and consider my prior comments of managing analog and digital files.....digitally.

737 relates fully to 747 and to both claim 1 and 19.....

When it rules on 737, it has to consider what the digital issues of 737 do for that which it has opinionated. To this point, IMO, it has not recognized the the word "digital information" in relation to what it ruled on.....and, IMO, is seeing it tied directly to claim 1 only.

If the court gives credence to 737 relating to that which it has ruled, IMO, all of 774 comes into focus.

IMO, the context of the word "information" is associated with the "ambiguity" that management mentions.

doni

6
Aug 19, 2011 01:08PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply