Re: child question
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 19, 2011 04:31PM
Hello Plankton,
I just wanted to reply. If you check my fairly recent posts, you'll see that I said something like "I couldn't imagine '737 without '774 already being in place". I also said that given the circumstances of JK's non-ruling this opened a door for a continued DM strategy to bring '774 back into play. IMO.
I also posted awhile ago, that if and when we get to the 3rd round I was concerned that DM might possibility have a conflict, particularily with Apple. I was relieved to see that possibilty eliminated. But there maybe others down the road. Well see.
Thank you for bringing the relationship between '737 & '774 up. Also, it may have been you that did the Apple and DM post. I simply don't fully remember. Age seems to do that, I reckon. But, whoever posted it, thank you. It was a relief.
I truly belive we are going to be alright in time.
Spec...