Free
Message: Re: Construction must respect the language of claim, even if it makes little sense
6
Aug 20, 2011 10:15AM
3
Aug 20, 2011 03:00PM
6
Aug 20, 2011 08:17PM
5
Aug 20, 2011 08:58PM
4
Aug 20, 2011 09:18PM
1
Aug 21, 2011 09:01AM

The Federal Circuit rejected the argument that the definition of “centrifugal unit” did nothing more than state the claimed invention’s intended field of use.

IMO, That is basically what is happening for e.Digital.

The court considers the "invention’s intended field of use".....that being file constructs....analog or digital ...."as applicable".....however, it over looks "digital information" in managing.

The novelty is not in the former....it's in the latter.

Thanks sman

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply