license #....settlement order.....defendant #

license 13...7...12. collectively referred to as “Panasonic” 26. Panasonic Corporation of North America....27. Panasonic Corporation...DONE..PRESS release first: . with prejudice ? (doc ? {? months})...PR6/28/2011announced today that it has entered into a license and settlement agreement with Panasonic Corporation (Panasonic). Under the terms of the confidential agreement, Panasonic obtained a license and release on the Company's Flash-R™ patent portfolio. "We are pleased to have entered into our 13th Flash-R portfolio related licensing and settlement agreement,"

note...PR link is hot...

I'd like to see if the pacer reads the same, having the same individual defendants listed?

I do not have a pacer for Panasonic

doni