You said:

"But with 774, a deceptive and misleading defense argument met with a judge who was either incapable of understanding the patent or predisposed to rule against the plaintiff, or both, and we got hammered as she erroneously ruled that defendants had worked around our patent by using RAM. JMHO."

1) You can your bet the back 10 acres of your ranch, that story is not over yet...

2) An erronous Order by one Judge with a penchant for error, does not make EDIG patents of less value. It is the PANIC sellers,( who have been crying the roof if falling, the roof is falling), assisted by the collective sharks that are MMs who have painted the present pps picture.

3) As Doni points out from a technical point of viewnothing has changed.

Gil...