The team went in and gave a verbal, they tossed ideas......and the examiner agreed with appropriate changes.

Note this is not centered around "sole memory".....this round....but descriptive issues missing in the claims 1 and 19 that the examiner feels must be present. The descriptive...eg.."removable" are spelled out for other areas of the patent....however not elaborated in claim1 and 19.

That's what I read.

doni