Re: Plankton LOVES EDIG!
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 23, 2012 02:57PM
I can't imagine spelling out very detailed issues within the "Detailed description of the invention" patent 774, as they have. Equating those details into the Claims..getting it published for all to copy and be beaten out by an argument of how conditions published in the "Detailed description of the invention" then referenced into the claims are not properly referenced.
Then compare those spelled out details to prior art that have no such explanations what so ever....
amazing
doni