There have been a lot of complainers over the years ....for whatever reasons.

Thing is, we're in the final hours, days ......why complain now?

I'm simply saying, where some here seem to object to it , that the paths of pursuing infringement are laid out. They are hinging control circuitry issues, which implement the use of flash memory, and are very much highlighted in the 147 docs of the first case.

The re-exam is now highlighted at getting an interpretation of the questioned claim term regarding power and control circuitry issues. The challenging defendant has presented its interpretation and e.Digital has presented its.

This re-exam activity directly relates to past issues, doc 147, and all that e.Digital /DM had to endure in getting discovery issues to float to the top. It relates to all the others as well, now that we see the re-exam challenge ventured by HTC.

In the end, settlements concluded, however, Samsung, along with previous and prior settlements are based on a maybe e-digital has a case, so lets settle at this juncture and not test it. If they get an iron clad interpretation of the claim term in question, there will be no discussing if the conditions are real or not.

With that, reviewing the status:

774 ....1-24-2012....Response after Non-Final Action Entered (or Ready for Examiner Action) ....no change

737....1-23-2012...Response after Non-Final Action Entered (or Ready for Examiner Action) ...no change

App 11/522,000....10-09-2010 (new security)...Docketed New Case - Ready for Examination....no change

doni