There are two separate issues.

One being the patents and the technical aspects of each. Are they origional and are othes violating the the concepts, etc.?

All of the discussion relating to the technical intracacy is simply an acedemic issue.

You can have the greatest patents ( as has been thought over the last ten or so years) but if you cannot market or license the capability, the technical superiority becomes meaningless.

Edig's downfall is that they have never learned how to market an idea. The past clearly indicates the lack of success and now we have a platform (software) that has been demonstrated a year ago, without interest to date as far as we know, and under development for more than a year which is probably becoming obsolete with each passing day.

They still haven't learned how to communicate as promised, maybe because they don't have anything to justify the last years efforts.