"Most likely because claims 1 and 19 of the patent were cancelled."

re directed....see claims 33 and 34.

With that.....as noted by the examiner the following claims still reference clam 1 and 19..

claim 6 as defined in claim 1, claim 7 as defined in claim 1, claim 9 as defined in claim 1, claim 10 as defined in claim 1, claim 12 as defined in claim 1, claim 15 as defined in claim 1, claim 20 as defined in claim 19, claim 21 as defined in claim 19,

I don't know how he can do that, without amending what I note, and pointing those claims to 33 and 34.

or directive something like..... claim 1, see claim 33, claim 19, see claim 34....?

doni