Re: 4S Siri v e.digital odyssey must watch
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 06, 2012 08:15PM
Simply...the Markman ruling, with regard to 737 was never ruled on...and there was an incomplete follow through by the court.
With that, 737 and 747 are connected...and are not as independent as the chronicle I just read....
This is the recent continunity of 737 with new application... connected to 774(application 08/229,731)...
90/011,379 filed on 12-08-2010(5742737 : METHOD FOR RECORDING VOICE MESSAGES ON FLASH MEMORY IN A HAND HELD RECORDER) which is Pending claims the benefit of 08/229,731
This application is Re-examination of | 08/810,210 | 03-03-1997 | Patented | 5,742,737 |
is a continuation of | 08/339,976 | 11-15-1994 | Abandoned | - |
is a Continuation-in-part of | 08/229,570 | 04-19-1994 | Abandoned | - |
is a Continuation-in-part of | 08/229,731 | 04-19-1994 | Patented | 5,491,774 |
737 applications old and new are leaning on application 08/229,731...if this application with subsequent new application to replace it for 774 have problems...IMO it's going to be infectious. This is the recent continunity of 774 with new application... connected to old application 08/229,731... 90/011,302 filed on 10-27-2010(5,491,774 : HANDHELD RECORD AND PLAYBACK DEVICE WITH FLASH MEMORY) which is Pending claims the benefit of 08/229,731
|
One has to wait and see how future continuity shakes out between the two.
doni
|