A woman was raped for many years by the same person and he authorities failed to act because their was no evidence of the crime. But then evidence is now examined and there is no doubbt that she has been violated.

He now wants a group to examine the issue and come up with a forced agreement where the man is not litagated or jailed for what he did. What kind of settlement do you think is approprate, or should a settlement even be considered.

EDIG has been violated by Sandisk for many years . Sandislk made a ton of money knowing that they violated EDIg's patten rights andnow Sandisk wants some one other than the courtsto decide what the penalty should be.

Fairness, justice , what is right goes out the window all because we want some kind of settlement where you and I know EDIG will get the shaft. Not my idea of justice. Sandisk is guilty of a criome and needs to pay or it. The billions they made is as a direct account of their theft. You need to tell me what is fair.