Free
Message: on-going royalties - yes doni

I Agree with doni, see below this doni's old post from June 2007 with the use of

"dismissed without prejudice"

PACER for WOLVERINE & Ikegami Electronics (USA)

Re: Pacer: not MH - motion to dismiss Summit

posted on Jun 07, 11 08:19PM (Log in to use the IP Check tool) [?]

"that the Plaintiff e.Digital’s claims against Defendant Summit are dismissed without prejudice"

So, what's it going to be similar to:

WOLVERINE”( TIC Company, Inc.)... without prejudice "has agreed to make an undisclosed lump sum payment for past infringing sales and to pay a royalty for any on-going sales of products that practice e.Digital's U.S. Patent 5,491,774" . .....(no license agreement)

Ikegami Electronics (USA) (1)... without prejudice "obtained a license and release on all e.Digital foreign and domestic patent rights and has agreed to pay an on-going royalty for the licensed rights." ....ALL...except Flash R

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply