I like the detail expressed in the Handal (and e.Digital) PR. DM never said anything like this, which makes me wonder how much actual DD they ever really did. Handal appears to have done some actual work/research to ensure the case is solid before they file lawsuits or conduct meetings with infringers. I do hope they're willing to go all the way and not settle for small amounts. Time will tell of course, but this is the first time I've felt like they weren't just throwing stuff against the wall to see what sticks.

"We have examined hundreds of products to determine whether they infringe e.Digital's patents. We have found that several products utilize core technologies that belong to and are patented by e.Digital," said Anton Handal, counsel for e.Digital. "The Flash-R patent portfolio is rich in technologies and teachings that are central to the functionality of many current consumer electronics products. Among these is the noise cancellation claims of the '108 patent, which, generally speaking, teach the use of two microphones in handheld devices to reduce background noise. We are also seeing the use of file editing functionalities in these products that are embodied in the '170 patent," he added. "In addition, we are seeing many flash-based devices utilizing a memory integrity technology that was originally patented by e.Digital. Determining memory integrity is very important technology in today's highly-integrated consumer electronics products," Handal stated.

IMO this is also part of getting the word out. Tell people what you have, why it's valuable, and why you’re suing the infringers. No need to hide facts. I think this is a good approach.

- Sinkman