e.Digital Corporation v. iriver, Ltd. et. al.

"We will continue to enforce our patents through fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory patent licensing or through litigation,” said Fred Falk, president and CEO of e.Digital. “Our objective is simply to monetize our technology for the betterment of the Company and our shareholders. Responsible companies like Diasonic and iriver, who respect the intellectual properties of others, are some of the most recent parties to license our technology. In addition, we are in licensing negotiations with several other companies which we expect will materialize into finalized agreements soon," added Falk.

e.Digital Corporation v. iriver, Ltd. et. al.

Patent: 5,742,737
Accused Products: The accused products for purposes of the ‘737 patent include but are not limited to the T5, T6, T8, T9, T60SE, B30, B100, E30, E40, E50, E100, E150, E200, E300, S100, P7, Lplayer, and SPINN mp3 and mp4 players. The accused products, alone or in combination with other products, practice each of the limitations of independent claims 1, 4, 9, and 13, and dependent claims 3 and 6 of the ’737 patent

Patent: 5,491,774
Accused Products: The accused products for purposes of the ’774 patent include but are not limited to the B30, B100, E100, E150, E200, E300, S100, and P7 mp3 and mp4 players. The accused products, alone or in combination with other products, practice each of the limitations of independent claims 33 and 34, and dependent claims 2, 6 through 8, 10 through 11, 15 through 16, 18, 23 through 26, and 28 through 31 of the ’774 patent.16, 18, 23 through 26, and 28 through 31 of the ’774 patent.3 through 26, and 28 through 31 of the ’774 patent.