Re: 07/08/2013 35 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Apple Inc
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 09, 2013 10:42AM
Let's hope so. I had the same thought as I skimmed over 35-1. If there is any truth to what the Apple attorneys are claiming, that Handal's response was minimalistic, vague, not fully explaining and other such descriptive words it does not sound like how Handal would do business unless there were some ulterior motive. First volley be vague, let Apple point that out, and then come in with the precise info?