Free
Message: Re: 07/08/2013 35 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Apple Inc

Let's hope so. I had the same thought as I skimmed over 35-1. If there is any truth to what the Apple attorneys are claiming, that Handal's response was minimalistic, vague, not fully explaining and other such descriptive words it does not sound like how Handal would do business unless there were some ulterior motive. First volley be vague, let Apple point that out, and then come in with the precise info?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply